I. SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
II. SUBJECT REQUIREMENTS
III. COURSE CURRICULUM
SUBJECT DATA
OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING PERFORMANCE
THEMATIC UNITS AND FURTHER DETAILS
Subject name
CORPORATIONAL QUALITY RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
ID (subject code)
BMEGT20VE03
Type of subject
Contact lessons
Course types and lessons
Type
Lessons
Lecture
4
Practice
0
Laboratory
0
Type of assessment
exam grade
Number of credits
5
Subject Coordinator
Name
Erdei János
Position
senior lecturer
Contact details
erdei.janos@gtk.bme.hu
Educational organisational unit for the subject
Department of Management and Business Economics
Subject website
Language of the subject
magyar - HU
Curricular role of the subject, recommended number of terms
Direct prerequisites
Strong
None
Weak
None
Parallel
None
Exclusion
None
Validity of the Subject Description
Approved by the Faculty Board of Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Decree No: 13th decision on the 580.059/2/2020 registration number . Valid from: 29.01.2020.

Objectives

• to highlight the role of quality management in the successful operation of organizations, • to promote a deeper understanding of the competitive nature of quality management, • to present the peculiarities of the quality management system of different production and service sectors, • to get acquainted with some proven methods and tools of quality management.

Academic results

Knowledge
  1. Competitive nature of quality management.
  2. The role of quality management in the successful operation of organizations.
  3. Some of the most popular quality management models, methods and tools.
Skills
  1. Capability of following and understanding the state of the art of quality management.
  2. Capability of communicating in a professional manner on quality management topics.
  3. Capability of participating professionally in solving quality management problems, preparing and/or making decisions in connection.
Attitude
  1. An open-minded approach of organizational development in quality management point of view.
  2. An open-minded approach of new results of quality management.
  3. An ability to seek the collaboration in multidisciplinary teamwork.
Independence and responsibility
  1. An ability to perform independent tasks in analyzing quality management problems.
  2. An ability to perform independent tasks in preparing and/or making quality management decisions.
  3. An ability to take responsibility for quality management decisions.

Teaching methodology

Lectures.

Materials supporting learning

  • Kemény S.–Papp L.–Deák A. (1999) Statisztikai minőség- (megfelelőség-) szabályozás. Műszaki Könyvkiadó–Magyar Minőség Társaság, Budapest.
  • Kiran, D.R.: Total Quality Management key concepts and case studies, Elsevier, 2017.
  • Kövesi J. – Topár J. (szerk.) (2006): Minőségmenedzsment alapjai, Typotex Kiadó, Budapest
  • MSZ EN ISO 9001:2015 Minőségirányítási Rendszerek - Követelmények MSZT 2015.
  • Tenner A. R. – DeToro I. J. (2001): Teljes körű minőségmenedzsment TQM 3. kiadás, Műszaki Könyvkiadó, Budapest
  • Topár J. (szerk.): A műszaki menedzsment aktuális kérdései Műszaki Kiadó Budapest, 2012.
  • Topár J (2001): A minőségmenedzsment -rendszerek fejlődésének néhány jellemzője a hazai vállalkozásoknál. Harvard Business Manager 4/2001 pp.50-57
  • Topár J. – Surman V. (2018) Minőségmenedzsment Oktatási segédanyaga Műszaki menedzser és a Vezetés és szervezés mesterszakos hallgatók számára

General Rules

Assessment of the learning outcomes described under point 2.2. is based on a written final exam.

Performance assessment methods

A. Detailed description of assessments during the term: - B. Assessment of the exam: 90 minutes, 100 points written exam.

Percentage of performance assessments, conducted during the study period, within the rating

Percentage of exam elements within the rating

  • written exam: 100%
  • total: 100%

Conditions for obtaining a signature, validity of the signature

From tasks, exercises and case studies (during the lecture or as a homework) the maximum of 25 plus points can be achieved. From the 25 points, collecting the minimum of 5 points is the requirement in order to be eligible for the final exam. These 5 points are not going to be counted as part of the exam, but the other maximum of 20 points is going to be added to the result of the exam after fulfilling the minimum of 50 % on it. These tasks, exercises and case studies are cannot be replaced.

Issuing grades

%
Excellent 94-100
Very good 87–94
Good 75–86
Satisfactory 63–74
Pass 50–62
Fail 50

Retake and late completion

Based on the Code of Studies.

Coursework required for the completion of the subject

Nature of work Number of sessions per term
participation in contact hours 24×2=48
preparation for contact hours 24×2=12
preparation for the exam 54
total 150

Approval and validity of subject requirements

Consulted with the Faculty Student Representative Committee, approved by Emma Lógó, PhD, Vice Dean for Education. Date: 20 Jan 2020 Valid from spring semester 2019/20

Topics covered during the term

The learning outcomes of 2.2 can be achieved by studying the following areas and topics

Lecture topics
1. Introduction. Basics of quality management.
2. The role and connected experiences of quality management systems in production and service sectors.
3. Process management and process maturity models, Six Sigma, Lean management.
4. Basics and steps of quality planning.
5. Supplier quality assurance, choosing and evaluating suppliers, first sampling (PPAP).
6. Quality costs.
7. Organizational self-evaluation, award models, CAF
8. Theoretical background and categorization of quality management methods and tools, data and information (analyses) on quality.
9. The concept, improvement and role of Benchmarking.
10. Processes of process improvement models, PDCA, DMAIC.
11. Idea collecting and brainstorming methods.
12. Process mapping and describing methods.
13. Problem (defect) analyzing methods.
14. Process control methods.
15. Other quality management tools.
16. Service quality models.

Additional lecturers

Name Position Contact details
Dr. Topár József c. egyetemi docens topar.jozsef@gtk.bme.hu
Surman Vivien egyetemi tanársegéd surman.vivien@gtk.bme.hu
Benedek Petra egyetemi adjunktus benedek.petra@gtk.bme.hu

Approval and validity of subject requirements

Part I-III of the Subject Form is to be approved by the Head of Department of Management and Business Economics named under 1.8.