I. SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
II. SUBJECT REQUIREMENTS
III. COURSE CURRICULUM
SUBJECT DATA
OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING PERFORMANCE
THEMATIC UNITS AND FURTHER DETAILS
Subject name
Environmental Evaluation and Risk Management
ID (subject code)
BMEGT42A022
Type of subject
contact unit
Course types and lessons
Type
Lessons
Lecture
2
Practice
0
Laboratory
0
Type of assessment
exam grade
Number of credits
3
Subject Coordinator
Name
Csigéné Dr. Nagypál Noémi
Position
senior lecturer
Contact details
csigene.noemi@gtk.bme.hu
Educational organisational unit for the subject
Department of Environmental Economics and Sustainability
Language of the subject
magyar - HU, angol - EN
Curricular role of the subject, recommended number of terms

Programme: BSc in Environmental Engineering

Subject Role: Compulsory for the specialisation

Recommended semester: 6

Programme: Elective subjects

Subject Role: Elective

Recommended semester: 0

Direct prerequisites
Strong
None
Weak
None
Parallel
None
Exclusion
None
Validity of the Subject Description
Approved by the Faculty Board of Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Decree No: 580251/13/2023 registration number. Valid from: 29.03.2023.

Objectives

The aim of the course is to provide knowledge to students about the theoretical background, methods as well as Hungarian and international experiences of environmental valuation and the theoretical background, main fields and measures of environmental risk management.

Academic results

Knowledge
  1. Knows the concept of Total Economic Value, the methods that are able to calculate it.
  2. Knows the concept of weak and strong sustainability and their relationship with monetary environmental valuation.
Skills
  1. to use the technical terms of environmental valuation correctly in Hungarian and English language.
  2. to realise the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in environmental valuation and risk management and able to apply it as a routine.
  3. to realise the economic and social context of environmental risk, its embeddedness.
  4. Has the necessary background knowledge in the field of environmental valuation for expert work and decision-making.
Attitude
  1. Knowing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach of environmental valuation and risk management, is open to cooperate with economic experts.
  2. Knowing the continuous development of environmental valuation tries to follow the changes.
  3. Knowing the most important elements of critics of environmental valuation methods and the limitations, is open to criticism.
Independence and responsibility
  1. Knowing the social context of environmental risk management, takes responsibility for his expert decisions.
  2. Knowing the involvement of other sciences in case of environmental valuation and risk management, is able to cooperate with economic and legal professionals.

Teaching methodology

Presentations about the theoretical curriculum, case studies to demonstrte the application of methods. Student presentation (optional) about a valuation or risk management case.

Materials supporting learning

  • 1. Dr. Szlávik János (szerk.): Környezetgazdaságtan. 3. fejezet. (Csigéné Nagypál Noémi) Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem. Typotex Kiadó, Budapest, 2007.
  • 2. Marjainé Dr. Szerényi Zsuzsanna (szerk.): A természetvédelemben alkalmazható közgazdasági értékelési módszerek. Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Minisztérium, Budapest, 2005.
  • 3. Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessmentand Management. Green Leaves III
  • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidelines-for-environmental-risk-assessment-and-management-green-leaves-iii
  • Ajánlott folyóiratok/recommended journals:
  • a. Ecological Economics
  • b. Land Economics
  • c. Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics
  • d. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
  • e. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

General Rules

The assessment of the learning outcomes formulated in point 2.2. is based on 2 mid-term written performance measurements, (or one mid-term + a student presentation) or a written exam.

Performance assessment methods

1. summative performance assessment: a complex, written way of evaluating the competence-type competence elements of the subject and knowledge in the form of mid-term exams. The part of the learning materials on which the evaluation is based refers to the topics covered in the previous lectures, the available working time is 45 minutes.

Percentage of performance assessments, conducted during the study period, within the rating

  • 1st summative performance assessment: 50
  • 2nd summative performance assessment : 50
  • total: 100

Percentage of exam elements within the rating

  • Written: 100

Conditions for obtaining a signature, validity of the signature

-

Issuing grades

%
Excellent 91-100
Very good 85–90
Good 76–84
Satisfactory 63–75
Pass 50–62
Fail 0-49

Retake and late completion

The summative performance assessments can be retaken or corrected individually free of charge during the repeat period. In case of correction, the more favourable result for the student is taken into account.

Coursework required for the completion of the subject

Nature of work Number of sessions per term
participation in contact lessons 28
homework preparation 0
preparation for performance assessment 30
preparation for exam 32
total 90

Approval and validity of subject requirements

Topics covered during the term

In order to achieve the learning outcomes set out in point 2.2, the subject consists of the following thematic blocks. In the syllabi of the courses announced in each semester, these topics are scheduled according to the calendar and other features.

Lecture topics
1. Evaluation and monetary valuation methods. Environmental impact assessment and its limitations. Ecological footprint calculation
2. Advantages and areas of application of monetary valuation. WTP and WTA. Ecosystem services. Criticism of evaluation
3. Weak and strong sustainability and environmental assessment. Ex ante and ex post evaluation. The total economic value. Why special methods are needed
4. The social discount rate. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Project evaluation.
5. Cost-based methods 1. Cost-based methods 2. Case studies
6. The declared preference methods 1. The travel cost method
7. The declared preference methods 2. The hedonic price method, the hedonic wage method
8. Cost-benefit analysis and externalities in the transport sector
9. The revealed preference methods 1. Preparation of a questionnaire, steps of conditional evaluation
10. Revealed preference methods 2. Case studies
11. Relationship between environmental assessment and risk management. Concept and types of risk

Additional lecturers

Name Position Contact details
Dr. Princz-Jakovics Tibor egyetemi adjunktus / senior lecturer princz-jakovics.tibor@gtk.bme.hu

Approval and validity of subject requirements