Programme: Organizational and business coach postgraduate specialization programme
Subject Role: Compulsory
Recommended semester: 3
Programme: Organizational and business coaching psychologist postgraduate specialization programme
Subject Role:
Recommended semester: 3
Objectives
As a result of the course, prepare the portfolio necessary to complete the coach and coaching psychologist training. To be able to prepare and critically process the works included in the portfolio (papers to be submitted, essays, study diaries, case reports) in such a way that it proves the existence and coherent integration of the theoretical knowledge, practical competencies, approach and, last but not least, ethical attitude acquired during the training.
Academic results
Knowledge
- Know the purpose, steps and evaluation criteria of portfolio creation.
- Know the competency profiles of the coach and coaching psychologist.
- Know the importance and challenges of professional identity work.
Skills
- Able to prepare the integrative and creative development work related to his own work.
- Able to critically evaluate and process your own professional experience.
- Able to solve problems, solve solutions, carry out practical work, evaluate results.
- Able to analyze the experience gained.
- Able to summarize and evaluate their activities during the training, as well as the related self-reflection and self-evaluation.
Attitude
- Accepts, understands and represents the complexity of psychological phenomena.
- Know and adhere to the boundaries of professional competence.
- Open to expanding knowledge related to your field.
- Open and motivated to apply the knowledge gained.
- Collaborate with the instructor and fellow students in expanding knowledge.
Independence and responsibility
- Expects and applies new knowledge.
- Takes an active part in the process of acquiring knowledge.
- Solve individual and group tasks responsibly and independently.
- Collaborates with fellow students in group work.
- Use a systemic approach in their thinking.
Teaching methodology
Lectures, individual and group consultations.
Materials supporting learning
- Kötelező irodalom: Kiadott órai anyagok. Ajánlott irodalom: Bachkirova, T. & Smith, C. (2015). From competencies to capabilities in the assessment and accreditation of coaches. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 13. 123-140. Bartram, D., & Roe, R. A. (2005). Definition and Assessment of Competences in the Context of the European Diploma in Psychology. European psychologist, 10(2), 93-102. Bird, T., 1990. The school teachers portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In Millman, J. & Hammond, L.,(Eds.), The New Handbookof Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. 2nd Edn., Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp: 241-256. Falus Iván – Kimmel Magdolna (2003): A portfólió. Gondolat Kiadói Kör, ELTE BTK Neveléstudományi Intézet, Budapest. Hungarian Association for Coaching Psychology (2021). Certification Process of HACP - ISCP Certified Coaching Psychologist. Belső Kiadány. Nguyen, M. B. (2021). Portfolio Assessment as a Tool for promoting reflection in Teacher Education: A Literature Review. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4). Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2007). Use of criteria in assessing teaching portfolios: Judgemental practices in summative evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), 103-117. Lai, Y. L., & McDowall, A. (2014). A systematic review (SR) of coaching psychology: Focusing on the attributes of effectivecoaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 9(2), 118-134. Lai, Y. L. (2014). Enhancing evidence-based coaching through the development of a coaching psychology competency framework: Focus on the coaching relationship. University of Surrey (United Kingdom). Vandaveer, Vicki & Lowman, Rodney & Pearlman, Kenneth & Brannick, Joan. (2016). A practice analysis of coaching psychology: Toward a foundational competency model. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 68. 118-142.
General Rules
A 2.2. pontban megfogalmazott tanulási eredmények értékelése a beadott portfólió alapján történik.
Performance assessment methods
Elemzés és integráló dolgozat (esszé) elkészítése: A képzés során elkészülő szakmai és önreflektív anyagok önálló, kritikai szemléletű áttekintése és értékelése, majd mindezen eredmények koherens dolgozattá integrálása. A dolgozat magában foglalja a hallgató képzés során elkészülő aktivitásait, azok értékelését, és a hozzá kapcsolódó önreflexiót és önértékelést. A hallgató feladata, hogy a képzés során elkészülő gyakorlati munkáit egy komplex portfólióvá integrálja, melyet szakmai önreflexióval egészít ki.
Percentage of performance assessments, conducted during the study period, within the rating
- Összegző tanulmányi teljesítményértékelés (Dolgozat, önreflektív): 100
Percentage of exam elements within the rating
Issuing grades
% | |
---|---|
Excellent | 95-100 |
Very good | 86–95% |
Good | 75–85% |
Satisfactory | 65–74% |
Pass | 50–64% |
Fail | 50% |
Retake and late completion
1. Az összegző tanulmányi teljesítményértékelés a pótlási időszakban – első alkalommal – díjmentesen pótolható vagy javítható.
Coursework required for the completion of the subject
Nature of work | Number of sessions per term |
---|---|
Részvétel a kontakt tanórákon | 20 |
Részvétel a konzultációkon | 20 |
Portfólió elkészítése | 260 |
összesen | 300 |
Approval and validity of subject requirements
Consulted with the Faculty Student Representative Committee, approved by the Vice Dean for Education, valid from: 04.11.2024.
Topics covered during the term
Lecture topics | |
---|---|
1. | What is a portfolio and what is its role in demonstrating professional development? |
2. | What should be included in the portfolio? |
3. | Which practical skills should be covered by the video demonstration component of the portfolio? |
4. | What are the criteria for evaluating the portfolio? |
5. | Clarification of requirements and submission deadlines. |
6. | What should be included in a self-reflective essay integrating elements of the portfolio? How to write a self-reflective essay? |
Additional lecturers
Name | Position | Contact details |
---|---|---|