I. SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
II. SUBJECT REQUIREMENTS
III. COURSE CURRICULUM
SUBJECT DATA
OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING PERFORMANCE
THEMATIC UNITS AND FURTHER DETAILS
Subject name
NEGOTIATION AND PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES
ID (subject code)
BMEGT41A010
Type of subject
contact lessons
Course types and lessons
Type
Lessons
Lecture
2
Practice
0
Laboratory
0
Type of assessment
seminary grade
Number of credits
2
Subject Coordinator
Name
Szabó Krisztina
Position
assistant professor
Contact details
szabo.krisztina@gtk.bme.hu
Educational organisational unit for the subject
Department of Philosophy and History of Science
Subject website
Language of the subject
magyar - HU
Curricular role of the subject, recommended number of terms

Programme: Elective subjects

Subject Role: Elective

Recommended semester: 0

Direct prerequisites
Strong
None
Weak
None
Parallel
None
Exclusion
None
Validity of the Subject Description
Approved by the Faculty Board of Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Decree No: 580485/10/2023 registration number. Valid from: 28.06.2023.

Objectives

The course seeks to deliver essential knowledge about negotiating and presentation techniques by using the method of role playing, simulations and other rhetorical exercises. It gives students the opportunity to practice common presentation situations (TDK presentation, project presentation, thesis defense, business presentation, etc.) while the lecturers give immediate, on-the-spot feedback to help their progress in a tailor-made fashion. The subject addresses the fundamental types and strategies of negotiation, the pitfalls of certain negotiating situations and their proposed remedies. Lectures aim to bridge the gap between theory and practice by using case study method and group exercises simulating real-life situations in order to be able to improve the students’ negotiating skills to prepar for the challenges of the labour market.

Academic results

Knowledge
  1. the fundamentals of the methodology of social sciences.
  2. the occurences and the consequences of the relations between science, education, society and media on various levels.
  3. how the discipline being studied fits into a larger disciplinary and social scheme, how it relates to the neighbouring fields, how these fittings give rise to using certain contexts.
  4. the fundamentals of various mechanisms of social decision-making.
Skills
  1. to use professional terms, basic concepts and advanced elements of the special terminology of the profession.
  2. to see and treat science in its embeddedness, to use an interdisciplinary approach.
  3. to analyze, evaluate, draw conclusions and synthesize explanations in their professional work.
  4. to provide a critical analysis of information by using a wide array of well-founded techniques.
  5. to participate in lifelong learning.
  6. to use a multi-sided, interdisciplinary approach to identify specific problems, to explore and define the detailed theoretical and practical background that is needed to solve these problems.
  7. to discover facts and basic relationships by applying the theories and methods learned. To systematize, to analyze, to draw conclusions, to give critical remarks, to prepare proposals of decision-making and to make decisions both in a routine and in a non-routine - domestic and international - environment.
Attitude
  1. Accepts and consistently and plausibly represents the diversity of the perspectives of social sciences in the related narrower and wider environment.
  2. Demonstrates and open mind to critical self-evaluation, to various forms of training, to the self-help forms of intellectual worldview. Endeavours for self-development in these areas.
  3. Has problem-centric perspective and problem-solving thinking.
Independence and responsibility
  1. Develops a historically and politically consistent individual opinion in the narrow disciplinary niche that helps to develop self and environment.
  2. Becomes autonomous, constructive and assertive both in intra- and extra-institutional forms of cooperation.
  3. Becomes self-reliant in work besides being constantly critical and correcting own work.
  4. Takes the responsibility in forming and justifying professional views.
  5. Takes the responsibility for own analyses, conclusions and decisions.

Teaching methodology

Written and oral communication.

Materials supporting learning

  • Diasorok a tárgy Moodle oldalán. Slides on the Moodle site of the subject.
  • Fischer, R. – W. Ury– B. Patton (1997): A sikeres tárgyalás alapjai. Budapest: Bagolyvár Kiadó.
  • Ury, W. (1993): Tárgyalás nehéz emberekkel. Budapest: Bagolyvár Kiadó.

General Rules

A 2.2. pontban megfogalmazott tanulási eredmények értékelése.

Performance assessment methods

Összegző tanulmányi teljesítményértékelés: a tantárgy és tudás, képesség típusú kompetenciaelemeinek komplex, írásos értékelési módja zárthelyi dolgozat formájában.

Percentage of performance assessments, conducted during the study period, within the rating

  • 1. összegző tanulmányi teljesítményértékelés: 50
  • 2. összegző tanulmányi teljesítményértékelés: 50
  • összesen: 100

Percentage of exam elements within the rating

Issuing grades

%
Excellent 91-100
Very good 86–90%
Good 74–85%
Satisfactory 62–73%
Pass 50–61%
Fail 49%

Retake and late completion

A félévközi érdemjegy megszerzésének feltétele a két zárthelyi dolgozat megírása, melynek külön-külön is el kell érniük az 50%-ot. A javítás és pótlás rendjét a hatályos TVSZ. szabályozza. A javító dolgozat eredménye a korábbi eredményt nem rontja.

Coursework required for the completion of the subject

Nature of work Number of sessions per term
részvétel a kontakt tanórákon 28
félévközi készülés a gyakorlatokra 0
felkészülés a teljesítményértékelésekre 32
házi feladat elkészítése 0
kijelölt írásos tananyag önálló elsajátítása 0
vizsgafelkészülés 0
összesen 60

Approval and validity of subject requirements

Consulted with the Faculty Student Representative Committee, approved by the Vice Dean for Education, valid from: 05.06.2023.

Topics covered during the term

Lecture topics
1. undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined

Additional lecturers

Name Position Contact details
Csordás Hédi Virág egyetemi tanársegéd csordas.hedi@gtk.bme.hu

Approval and validity of subject requirements