I. SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
II. SUBJECT REQUIREMENTS
III. COURSE CURRICULUM
SUBJECT DATA
OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING PERFORMANCE
THEMATIC UNITS AND FURTHER DETAILS
Subject name
History of Science
ID (subject code)
BMEGT41M300
Type of subject
contact lessons
Course types and lessons
Type
Lessons
Lecture
2
Practice
0
Laboratory
0
Type of assessment
seminar grade
Number of credits
3
Subject Coordinator
Name
Dr. Bíró Gábor István
Position
assistant professor
Contact details
biro.gabor@gtk.bme.hu
Educational organisational unit for the subject
Department of Philosophy and History of Science
Language of the subject
magyar - HU; angol - EN
Curricular role of the subject, recommended number of terms

Programme: MSc in Engineering Management

Subject Role: Elective

Recommended semester: 2

Direct prerequisites
Strong
None
Weak
None
Parallel
None
Exclusion
None
Validity of the Subject Description
Approved by the Faculty Board of Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Decree No: 580768/11/2022. Valid from: 26.10.2022.

Objectives

The aim of the course is to develop a comprehensive picture of the fundamental changes and approaches of science and philosophy, the nature and significance of science and philosophy.

Academic results

Knowledge
  1. 1. Knows the basics and methodology of the history of science.
  2. 2. Knows the connections between science, education, society and the media, the different manifestations of this relationship and their consequences.
  3. 3. Knows the broader system of her field, recognizes the relationships with related disciplines, uses the opportunities provided by the wider system and the contexts related to the system.
  4. 4. Possesses adequate and sufficient knowledge to orient herself in the various mechanisms of social decision-making.
Skills
  1. 1. Confidently uses the vocabulary and the basic scientific concepts of the profession, and the elements of the special vocabulary based on them.
  2. 2. Possesses the ability to gain a new perspective, she is able to approach science and its environment with an interdisciplinary approach.
  3. 3. In solving her professional tasks, she is able to independently analyze, evaluate, and synthesize conclusions and explanations.
  4. 4. She is able to apply a wide range of well-established techniques for the critical analysis and processing of information.
  5. 5. She is able to participate in the process of lifelong learning.
  6. 6. Identifies special professional problems with an interdisciplinary approach, explores and articulates the detailed theoretical and practical background needed to solve them.
  7. 7. Using the learned theories and methods, she explores, systematizes and analyzes facts and basic connections, formulates independent conclusions, critical remarks, and decision-making proposals, and makes decisions in routine and partly unknown - domestic and international - environments.
Attitude
  1. 1. Accepts and consistently embraces the diversity of social scientific thinking and credibly represents its conceptual foundations in her narrower and wider environment.
  2. 2. Open to critical self-reflection, various forms of professional development, self-improvement methods of intellectual worldview and strives for self-development in these areas.
  3. 3. Possesses a problem-centric perspective and problem-solving thinking.
Independence and responsibility
  1. 1. In her own professional environment, she develops a historically and politically coherent individual position, which helps the development of herself and her environment.
  2. 2. She is independent, constructive and assertive in forms of cooperation inside and outside the institution.
  3. 3. Carries out her work independently with a critical evaluation and continuous correction of her activity.
  4. 4. Participates responsibly in the development and justification of her professional views.
  5. 5. Responsible for her analyzes, conclusions and decisions.

Teaching methodology

lectures

Materials supporting learning

  • Tankönyvek / Textbooks
  • A tárgyhoz kapcsolódó jegyzet és a bemutatott slide-ok letölthetőek a tantárgy hivatalos elektronikus felületéről / Lecture notes and PPT-slides available on Moodle.
  • Dear, Peter. 2019. Revolutionizing The Sciences, 3rd edition, Red Globe Press.
  • Grant, Esward. 1996. THE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN SCIENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES: THEIR RELIGIOUS, INSTITUTIONAL AND INTELLECTUAL CONTEXTS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS: CAMBRIDGE.
  • Lindberg, David C. 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious and Institutional Context, 600. B.C. to A.D. 1450, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

General Rules

The assessment of the learning outcomes (enlisted in point 2.2) are done through two midterm exams, one written assignment (homework) and (optional) through active participation in class.

Performance assessment methods

1. Summative learning assessment: two midterms during the semester or during the exam period. 2. Written assigntment (homework): writing an essay about a topic previously discussed with and approved by the lecturer. The essay should be in Times New Roman, font size 12, with line spacing 1,5 and should be 3-5 pages in length.

Percentage of performance assessments, conducted during the study period, within the rating

  • obligatory: 33
  • obligatory: 33
  • obligatory: 34

Percentage of exam elements within the rating

Conditions for obtaining a signature, validity of the signature

One from the two midterms plus the written assignment (homework) should be completed (with at least satisfactory mark) during the semester in order to be able to earn a signature.

Issuing grades

%
Excellent 90-100
Very good 81-90
Good 71-80
Satisfactory 61-70
Pass 51-60
Fail 0-50

Retake and late completion

One midterm can be (re)done on the retake week, before the exam period.

Coursework required for the completion of the subject

Nature of work Number of sessions per term
classwork 28
learning for the midterms 32
homework 30

Approval and validity of subject requirements

Consulted with the Faculty Student Representative Committee, approved by the Vice Dean for Education, valid from: 10.10.2022.

Topics covered during the term

A 2.2. pontban megfogalmazott tanulási eredmények eléréséhez a tantárgy a következő tematikai blokkokból áll. Az egyes félévekben meghirdetett kurzusok sillabuszaiban e témaelemeket ütemezzük a naptári és egyéb adottságok szerint.

Lecture topics

Additional lecturers

Name Position Contact details
Dr. Paksi Dániel egyetemi adjunktus paksi.daniel@gtk.bme.hu

Approval and validity of subject requirements